Quote of the Week: "the lawmaker came away from the session saying they were on the same page" from a story this week talking about "environmentalist" Congressman Hinchey and his meeting with N.Y. City airport operator, the Port Authority, who is pushing for an upstate "reliever" air cargo airport


Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter #414.........................................................................February 4,  2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm  The PASSUR airport flight tracking system at many major U.S. airports  http://www.passur.com/sites.htm (you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the newsletter sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy rockaway@prodigy.net


"Environmentalist" Congressman Promotes N.Y. Air Cargo Airport!!!


As Bill Sees It: (Editorial): Rural New Yorkers Starting To React To 4th Major Airport Scheme: It's interesting to watch this drama unfold as some people in upstate New York State are starting to realize they are being used by New York City and New Jersey to "relieve" themselves of heavily night-operating air cargo traffic by sending it to Stewart Airport, located near Newburg in upstate New York. I found this Ulster County Press cartoon by Neseman this week which illustrates this awakening. Unfortunately, as always, the most of the upstate New York media and local chambers of commerce are hailing this environmental atrocity as greatest thing to ever happen to beautiful, quiet upstate New York!!! No doubt they are dreaming of a new source of revenue. Even Democrat politicians like Rep. Maurice Hinchey , who likes to portray himself as an environmentalist, met with the Port Authority in Washington to plan this air cargo terminal. No doubt Hinchey and the Port Authority waited until after he was safety reelected before they made the announcement about the Steward air cargo terminal. Hopefully, the many environmental groups (at least the ones that already haven't been co-opted by the Port Authority and the politicians) upstate will form a coalition to fight this latest assault on the public and demand that all laws and environmental regulations are strictly followed. PBS Nova Does Excellent Show On SwissAir Flt.111 Crash Investigation: I didn't get to watch all of the show, but it was well done. I was especially interested in their showing how the FAA approved insulation, which was "supposed" to be fire resistant,  burned so well. This flammable stuff is in HALF of America's planes!!! Airspace Redesign Meetings Scheduled For April: The FAA is rushing their racist, unjust and illegal routing scheme for the N.Y. City/Philadelphia area as quickly as they can. According to Robert Belzer, President, NJCAAN www.njcaan.org  (read below) the meetings will begin in April.

N.Y. Port "Authority" And Upstate Congressman "On The Same Page" For Air Cargo Airport: Washington – Congressman Maurice Hinchey invited officials of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to his Washington, DC office to talk about the agency’s plans to take over Stewart Airport at Newburgh. And the lawmaker came away from the session saying they were on the same page. Hinchey said while the airport will grow with new jobs and increased economic development, it must be balanced growth. “We have to make sure that it is developed in a way that is going to be consistent with the general needs of the area, that it will be environmentally sound and that the impact of the airport will be minimal on people in the general area,” he said. “We want to make sure that the airport conforms with the needs of the communities that are adjacent to Stewart and that it is run in a way that is consistent with the needs of those communities.” On concern to Hinchey is surface transportation to the airport. The Drury Lane entrance and the I-84/Thruway direct connection projects are both under way. He is also anxious to advance a rail link to the airport. http://www.catskillsnews.com/News/SWF_Hinchey-31Jan07.html Editor's Note: Did Hinchey invite any of his constituents who will have to endure the late night air cargo overflights to the meeting? Of course not. You just have to read the news stories about communities screaming for relief from noise to see that there is no such thing as an environmentally (pardon the pun) "sound" airport. The phrase on the upper left "a national leader protecting the environment" is from Hinchey's web site. This guy has successfully fooled local environmentalists for many years.

The European Commission will cap emissions from both domestic and international airlines at 2004–2006 levels: As of 2012, all flights into and out of the EU will be covered by the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions trading system, under a proposal laid out by the European Commission (EC) in late December. The system is the centerpiece of EU efforts to meet emissions reduction targets agreed to under the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. Including aviation is necessary, EC officials say, to account for the environmental costs of rapidly growing emissions from this sector, which are threatening to wipe out gains made by other sectors. To counter threats of legal action by the U.S., international carriers will be given an extra year to comply. Air travel currently accounts for only about 3% of total greenhouse gas emissions in Europe, but these are expected to more than double by 2020 under a business-as-usual scenario. Since 1990, aviation emissions have increased 87%. With this measure, EC officials estimate annual CO2 savings of 46% or 183 million tons by 2020. The EC will set pollution limits based on average aviation emissions in 2004–2006, allocating credits to specific airlines. The airlines will then be able to buy, sell, or bank the credits within the aviation sector to meet their required reductions. The legislation now moves to the European Parliament and Council of Ministers for adoption, which typically takes 1–2 years. http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2007/jan/policy/kc_aviation.html Editor's Note: Our warmongering President Polluter is fighting tooth and claw not to have U.S. planes included in the EU pollution analysis. 715 More days of Bush...can we take it???

Deicing Additives Found Toxic To Fish!!! WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 (UPI) -- U.S. scientists have found aircraft deicing chemicals are toxic to aquatic life forms. The U.S. Geological Survey has been examining toxicity of a variety of formulations used to remove or prevent dangerous ice buildup on aircraft. The study confirmed proprietary additives are responsible for the observed toxicity. The USGS scientists compared nine different formulations of deicers and found neither the primary ingredients -- ethylene glycol and propylene glycol -- nor the known additives accounted for all observed toxicity. Additives are included to improve a formulation's effectiveness. Those that are proprietary have compositions known only to the manufacturer. Although research conducted in the 1990's revealed the toxicity of proprietary additives, the new study compared numerous deicers and anti-icers and confirmed most still have toxic additives that have not been publicly identified. "This study suggests that some deicers ... currently in use are safer for the environment than the deicers used in the 1990's," said Steve Corsi, lead author of the USGS study. "But the toxicity profiles of anti-icers -- products that prevent ice and snow buildup -- have not changed significantly." 
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Science&article=UPI-1-20070118-15182400-bc-us-deicers.xml 

Massachusetts, Logan Airport "Citizen's Committee" Refuses To Hear Impacted Community Representatives!!! CAMBRIDGE - A committee advising MassPort last night approved changes in Logan Airport flight paths that proponents say will help quiet the sky above the South Shore. In a sometimes tense meeting, the Logan Citizens Advisory Committee, comprised of representatives from 29 communities affected by the airport, approved a variety of changes to current landing and departure procedures. The changes still require approval from the Federal Aviation Administration. ‘‘This is an important step for the communities,’’ said Flavio Leo, manager of aviation planning for MassPort, the state agency that operates Logan Airport.  Marshfield and Duxbury have not had representatives on the advisory committee recently, despite efforts to involve those towns. Last night, the Scituate Board of Selectmen sent town planner Laura Harbottle to the meeting. The committee was following strict parliamentary procedure and Harbottle, as a nonmember, was not allowed to speak. After the meeting, she said ‘‘it’s obvious Scituate is going to be affected and I was amazed they didn’t even let me speak,’’ Harbottle said. Editor's Note: Of course not. The whole purpose of the meeting is to dump new flights on Scituate and other communities. 
 http://www.patriotledger.com/articles/2007/01/18/news/news01.txt   

Pennsylvania: Frozen Airplane Waste Missile Used As Example Of Aviation Dangers: Pointing out an incident on Jan. 18 when an airplane's frozen waste crashed through the roof of a Ridley Township house, Delaware County Councilman Jack Whelan told the township commissioners last week that the accident illustrates the safety concerns involving planes flying over populated communities before they reach an altitude of 3,000 feet. Whelan said Penny Meyers and her 4-year old daughter were standing just outside the master bedroom of their Donna Avenue home when the ice came through the roof. The residents could have been severely injured if they had been in the bedroom. Both suffered minor scratches from flying ice. Whelan pledged the continued support of county council, in conjunction with the township commissioners and other officials from neighboring municipalities, to convince the FAA not to change the airspace redesign for planes taking off from Philadelphia Airport that now sends them over the Delaware River until they reach an altitude of 3,000 feet before they can make a turn so another plane can be cleared for take-off. http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=17794364&BRD=2255&PAG=461&dept_id=451706&rfi=6 

JetBlue Made Her Sick!!! The thought of flying JetBlue makes Phyllis Gershon sick to her stomach. The 73-year-old Manhattan woman is suing the popular airline for $5.5 million after she was allegedly bounced from a flight for asking for a large barf bag in case she got a case of airsickness. "It was a nightmare," Gershon said. "I've had nightmares about it." In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Gershon charged she was the recipient of "hysterical and unjustified actions" by JetBlue while trying to fly home from Burbank, Calif., in October. Gershon claims she told two airline employees she was feeling queasy - even pulling out a three-day-old, half-eaten sandwich as proof - and asked for a bag. The employees started to argue with her before booting her from the plane. The experience, she charged, made her feel like "she had been accused of being a terrorist." http://www.nydailynews.com/01-31-2007/news/story/493387p-415600c.html 

 

England: Prince Charles Cancels Ski Trip To Reduce His Pollution Footprint: LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Charles has canceled a traditional skiing holiday in a bid to reduce his carbon footprint, his office said Saturday -- a day after campaigners and a government minister criticized his decision to fly to New York to collect an award for work on environmental issues. Environment Secretary David Miliband expressed reservations Friday about the heir to the British throne traveling to the United States for the ceremony, while advocacy groups urged the prince to use a video link instead. Prince Charles' Clarence House office said the prince had decided last year to cancel a regular skiing holiday to Switzerland as part of an effort to reduce the number of flights he takes. Details of the prince's carbon footprint are scheduled to be published along with his annual office accounts later this year. The document will set out targets for the reduction of carbon emissions by his office and household. Plane Stupid, a climate change group, and Britain's Green Party complained Friday that Prince Charles would be accompanied to the U.S. by an entourage of around 20 people, increasing the cost in carbon emission terms of the trip. Editor's Note: If he really cared about the environment his majesty should be out demonstrating with the communities that will be hit with Heathrow Airport's third runway noise impacts. http://www.streetsblog.org/2007/01/25/are-port-authoritys-airport-expansionists-flying-blind/  http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/01/20/uk.prince.ap/index.html 

                               @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@               

Important Aviation News Stories This Week

4th Major Hub for Air Traffic Moves Ahead 

By PATRICK McGEEHAN  http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/25/nyregion/25airport.html?ex=1327381200&en=af6d969968d355f8&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Published: January 25, 2007

The plan to create a fourth major airport that could relieve crowding and delays in the metropolitan region will take a leap forward today, officials of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said yesterday.

The Port Authority plans to acquire a 93-year lease on Stewart International Airport, a sleepy and underused airport 60 miles north of New York City, for $78.5 million and begin expanding it starting in the fall, said Anthony R. Coscia, the agency’s chairman.

With the expected approval of the agency’s board today, the acquisition could help solve a problem that has bedeviled aviation officials for almost 50 years: where to send some of the travelers and cargo that are starting to overwhelm Kennedy International, La Guardia and Newark Liberty International Airports.

“The region clearly needs additional capacity for air travel,” Mr. Coscia said. “It’s undeniable. This is intended to remedy exactly that problem.”

The agency has already budgeted $150 million for improvements to Stewart that could include additional parking and the construction of an international passenger terminal, he said.

A converted Air Force base whose commercial use has never met its potential, Stewart is bigger than Newark’s airport, with 2,400 acres and a 11,818-foot runway. Two low-fare airlines, JetBlue Airways and AirTran Airways, began offering flights recently from Stewart, in New Windsor, N.Y. Three other carriers operate limited service from there.

Passenger traffic at Stewart increased 33 percent last month, compared with December 2005, and it could triple this year to about 900,000 passengers, said Tanya Vanasse, general manager for marketing at Stewart. Although Stewart is a small cousin to the region’s three main airports, which together handled more than 100 million passengers last year, that is expected to change.

Mr. Coscia said that by drawing more of the travelers who live north and west of New York City, Stewart could serve more than three million passengers a year within five or six years. Most of that traffic would be diverted from the three big airports, he said, which had been projected to reach capacity by 2020 without considering any expansion at Stewart.

Some of the cargo that arrives at those other airports and some of the private aircraft that now clog the short runways at Teterboro Airport in northern New Jersey could also go to Stewart, Mr. Coscia said.

The plan to acquire Stewart reflects a significant shift in Port Authority politics. The Pataki administration was unenthusiastic about the plan, despite Mr. Coscia’s persistent push to take control of Stewart and link it to New York City’s crowded transportation system.

But now the plan has the support of Gov. Eliot Spitzer, as well as New Jersey’s governor, Jon S. Corzine, said Anthony E. Shorris, whom Mr. Spitzer appointed to be executive director of the Port Authority.

“We’re viewing this as a major milestone,” Mr. Shorris said. “My sense is when you have very strong support from two governors on this — now, two governors on this — you’ll see a concerted effort to make it happen.”

Making it happen will require legislative change in Trenton because the Port Authority’s bi-state charter limits its operations to a zone that extends 25 miles in all directions from the Statue of Liberty. In 1967, lawmakers in Albany passed a bill allowing the authority to have one airport outside that zone in each state. But New Jersey never passed its own version of that legislation.

Richard J. Codey, the president of the New Jersey State Senate, said that getting matching legislation to Governor Corzine’s desk should not be a problem.

“I’d have no problem sponsoring it,” Mr. Codey said. “I would think there should be a majority of support for it because it’s time. We just don’t have any more room at Newark or Teterboro.”

Mr. Spitzer signaled a break in the impasse this month in his State of the State speech in Albany.

In a statement released yesterday, Mr. Spitzer said: “We will continue to make major investments at J.F.K., Newark and La Guardia, but eventually we are simply going to run out of room. Stewart International Airport will provide much-needed relief for our three major airports, greatly reduce delays and help us prepare for inevitable population and passenger growth.”

Before Stewart was settled on, several alternatives in the region were studied, including Long Island Islip MacArthur Airport and Westchester County Airport.

The current leaseholder at Stewart, National Express Group, a British company, put the lease up for sale last year. National Express, which paid $35 million for the lease from the New York State Department of Transportation in 2000, wanted to sell it by the end of 2006.

But without the support of the Pataki administration, Mr. Coscia could not seal a deal and feared that the agency might miss a rare chance. Port Authority officials managed to persuade National Express to wait on the sale by offering a higher price than did other bidders that investment bankers had lined up.

“We felt the need to take advantage of this opportunity,” Mr. Coscia said. The agency had an advantage over other potential buyers, he said, in that “when we invest money we don’t have to get a return in the same 12 months.”

He said the Port Authority probably could break even on the proposed lease purchase without making any changes in operations at Stewart.

There remains opposition to the plan. Maureen Radl, a resident of Cragsmoor a chairwoman of Ulsterites Fight Overflight Noise, a group opposed to a major expansion of Stewart, said most elected officials now support the Port Authority plan but many nearby residents did not.

“We’re especially concerned about its development as a cargo hub,” Ms. Radl said, adding that cargo planes are generally older and noisier than passenger jets and frequently take off and land at night and early in the morning.

FAA Airspace Redesign Public Meetings In April

 

NJCAAN has learned that the FAA expects to schedule public meetings for the Airspace Redesign project in April—one in each state affected by the Redesign.  The purpose of the meetings is to review noise mitigation strategies that the agency expects to include in the preferred alternative.  The agency expects to publish the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) in June and issue a record of decision (ROD) in August. 

 

NJCAAN believes that the redesign proposals include the following structural environmental issues:

 

1)      fanning departures at the area’s commercial airports (EWR, LGA, PHL), which increases low altitude aircraft traffic over densely populated residential communities;

2)      eliminating noise abatement procedures at EWR, HPN, and PHL;

3)      increasing noise contours at all of the area’s commercial airports (EWR, LGA, JFK, PHL);

4)      reducing the overall altitudes for arrivals;

5)      introducing low altitude holding patterns in the metropolitan area;

6)      a new westbound departure corridor for JFK and the smaller Long Island airports (FOK, FRG, ISP), which redirects this traffic from routes over the Atlantic Ocean to routes over Long Island and New York City; and,

7)      increasing aircraft emissions in the metropolitan area. 

 

We are very skeptical that the agency can include appropriate mitigation that addresses all of these issues.  The meeting dates will be posted at the project Internet site at: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/nas_redesign/regional_guidance/eastern_reg/nynjphl_redesign/

 

Robert Belzer

President, NJCAAN

www.njcaan.org