Quote of the Week:  "Setting the standard at 70 parts per billion could reduce exposures that produce health problems nationwide by as much as 90 percent"  Lydia Wegman, director of the EPA's health and environmental impacts division.

Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter #434................................................................................June 24,  2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm  The PASSUR airport flight tracking system at many major U.S. airports  http://www.passur.com/sites.htm (you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the newsletter sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy rockaway@prodigy.net

EPA Proposes Stronger "Ground Level" Ozone Regulations!!!

As Bill Sees It: (Editorial): Will EPA's New Ozone Rule To Leave Out Aviation And Airports? I was happy to see that the EPA has proposed new standards for ground level ozone levels (smog); but then I realized who the EPA's boss was. This is the same EPA that assured New Yorkers the air was fine after the World Trade Center attack. The important thing about this new EPA proposed rule is that it talks about ground level ozone pollution. While most of environmentalist concerns about aviation emissions focus on its effect of greenhouse gas creation in the upper atmosphere, ground level pollution is usually ignored. The air that humans breath is on the ground and it is that what causes increased cases of Asthma and cancer. Of course nowhere in any of the news stories was there any mention of aviation emissions causing ozone or any plans to monitor them..  Efforts to have air quality around airports tested have been vigorously opposed by the EPA, FAA, the airline industry and their paid political agents. However, in Europe, where the aviation industry does not have the same stranglehold over politicians...yet, there HAVE been studies (read one below) done and it shows serious local health impacts caused by airports. The reason airport air pollution is high is not only the planes taking off and landing. Airports also store huge amounts of aviation fuel that gets vented into the air. Solvents, oils, cars and buses are other sources of airport air pollution. If the EPA or FAA ever does mandate reduction of aviation emissions, you can be sure that limiting airport capacity or expansion will not be one of the solutions. You can be sure any new rules will focus on giving tax dollars to the airplane manufacturers to develop more efficient engines and not on cancer and asthma in communities located near airports.  Exposing Airports' Poison Circles: Read  a 2001 article that talks about the increased cancer for those who live six miles near an airport. http://www.areco.org/ExpAir.pdf 

EPA Proposes Stricter Limits On Ozone Pollution: David Baron, the Earthjustice attorney who handled the deadline suit, said the new proposal is not strong enough. "It's especially troubling that EPA's proposal leaves the door open for keeping the current standard in place, when the science advisors unanimously said that's unacceptable. We strongly urge EPA to do the right thing and adopt limits on smog pollution that clean up the air in our neighborhoods and communities." Ground-level ozone is not emitted directly into the air, but is created through a reaction of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compound emissions in the presence of sunlight. Emissions from industry, electric utilities, vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents are the major human sources of these ozone precursors.  http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jun2007/2007-06-22-09.asp 

WASHINGTON: FAA Airspace Redesign Plan Scrapped!! — A controversial plan to reroute commercial air traffic over the Wasatch range has been scrapped, based on word Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, said he received Tuesday from the Federal Aviation Administration. Since 2003, the Federal Aviation Administration had worked on the Northern Utah Airspace Initiative to tackle flight delays and overcrowded airspace. In a routine call to the Transportation Department checking on the plan's status, Matheson's office learned the FAA has dropped the plan for now. FAA spokesman Paul Turk confirmed that the plan has been dropped and that other changes the administration would be looking into would not alter the flight paths. Matheson said the administration told him that it would "reassess operational safety and efficiency needs" after it implements several other improvements. What these improvements will be exactly are not yet clear. "I will be monitoring developments and will continue to request updates from the FAA regarding planned 'enhancements' so that I can keep Salt Lake Valley residents informed," said Matheson, who sent a letter to the FAA asking for clarification on the matter. Editor's Note: 
Airport "improvements" is FAAspeak for more planes, more noise and more air pollution. http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,680192732,00.html 

              @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@  

                                    Important Aviation News Stories This Week

Dangerous levels of toxic gas detected at most major airports

CSP study shows some exceed EU limits by up to 75 per cent

Levels of a toxic atmospheric pollutant exceed EU limits at most airports in England, according to a new report published today by the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP).

Over two thirds (16 out of 23) of the airports included in the CSP’s study recorded dangerously high levels of nitrogen dioxide – a noxious gas that irritates the airways of the lungs and causes breathing difficulties. The EU says nitrogen dioxide levels need to stay below 40 micrograms per cubic metre of air (mcg/m3) to be safe, but airports in Newcastle, Birmingham and London (Heathrow and Gatwick) exceed this recommendation by up to 75 per cent.

Readings at airports in Manchester, Liverpool, Blackpool, Sheffield, Humberside, London (City), Southampton, Exeter and Gloucester are up to 50 per cent higher than the EU target.

'The effects of airport emissions on air quality and public health are of serious concern to physiotherapists. It’s not just nitrogen dioxide polluting the environment around airports; our study reveals high ozone (see note 4) concentrations at some sites too. There’s no doubt that aircraft contribute to the problem, but it should be noted that cars, buses and taxis ferrying passengers to and from these sites are dominant sources of pollution. With cheap flights making air travel more affordable, several airports want to expand capacity. We would urge the government to consider ways of balancing passenger convenience with improving public health when looking at these proposals.'

Table 1 shows latest readings for levels of nitrogen dioxide in the air surrounding airports (SEE BELOW). Scores over 4 indicate the airport’s nitrogen dioxide levels exceed the EU limit of 40µg/m3. For more info on data source, see note 2.

Table 2 explains the scoring system used in Table 1 and highlights how much nitrogen dioxide is needed to arrive at a score between 1 and 10. An airport recording a score of 7, for example, has levels of nitrogen dioxide between 60-70 (µg/m3).

Data source: Ambient Air Quality: Scores of Nitrogen Dioxide concentrations at background and roadside locations, 2003 (January-December).

Table 1

Airport	roadside NO2 score
Newcastle International Airport	7
Birmingham International Airport	7
London Heathrow Airport	7
London Gatwick Airport	7
Manchester Airport	6
Liverpool Airport	6
Blackpool Airport	6
Sheffield City Airport	6
Humberside International Airport	6
London City Airport	6
Southampton International Airport	6
Exeter Airport	6
Gloucestershire Airport	6
Teesside International Airport	5
Norwich Airport	5
Plymouth City Airport	5
Leeds Bradford International Airport	4
London Luton Airport	4
Cambridge Airport	4
Ipswich Airport	4
London Biggin Hill Airport	4
Shoreham Airport	4
Isle of Wight (Sandown) Airport	3

Table 2

Score	% of EU limit value	Nitrogen Dioxide concentration (µg/m3)
1	0-25	0-10
2	25-50	10-20
3	50-75	20-30
4	75-100	30-40
5	100-125	40-50
6	125-150	50-60
7	150-175	60-70
8	175-200	70-80
9	200-225	80-90
10	225-250	90-100

Ends

Notes to editors

1. For more information please call the CSP press office on 020 7306 6616/6628/6163 or mobiles 07786 332 197, 07795 564 240, 07900 160 349
2. Data Source - Nitrogen Dioxide title: Ambient Air Quality: Scores of Nitrogen Dioxide concentrations at background and roadside locations, 2003 (January-December). The geography used is the middle layer super output areas, which have been mapped to the locations of airports.   The data supplier is the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the data was taken from National Statistics.   The dataset used provides scores of annual mean nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration for 2003 at background and roadside locations in the UK. The data are collected by Netcen on behalf of Defra and the Devolved Administrations. The scores in this dataset are calculated by comparing annual mean nitrogen dioxide concentrations for 2003 in MSOAs with the EU Limit Value of 40 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3) which comes into force in 2010. The scores reported in this dataset are calculated from a modelled annual mean concentration (an average over the whole year) in micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3). Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is an oxide of nitrogen, and is associated with adverse effects upon human health. NO2 may have both acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) effects on health, particularly in people with asthma. There is evidence to show that long-term exposure to NO2 may affect lung function and that exposure to NO2 enhances the response to allergens in sensitized individuals.
3. NO2 levels were not available for the following airports: East Midlands International, London Southend, Stansted, Manston, Bristol International, Land's End, Newquay (Cornwall), St. Mary's, Bournemouth International, Cardiff International
4. Of 33 airports in England and Wales, all but two (Sheffield City and London Heathrow) have ozone levels which exceed the Air Quality Strategy’s objective of having no greater than 10 days with running 8-hour mean ozone concentrations greater than 100 µg/m3. Use the Word download link below to view the ozone results.
5. Respiratory physios treat a range of conditions, including those that come under the umbrella term of ‘Obstructive Airways Disease’ such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma and Bronchiectasis. To find out more about the conditions respiratory physios treat, the effects pollution can have on their patients and the type of intervention provided, please call the CSP press office on the numbers below to set up an interview with an ACPRC member.
6. The GB union movement signed up to tackling poor air quality at the TUC’s 2005 annual congress.
7. The CSP is the professional, educational and trade union body for the country’s 47,000 chartered physiotherapists, physiotherapy students and assistants.