
Quote of the Week: "I'm an optimist that we can really disrupt this thing," news story quote from lawyer hired by Rockland County, New York to see if there are grounds for a lawsuit against the FAA and their unjust, corrupt Airspace Redesign Scheme
Aviation Conspiracy Newsletter #442.............................................................................August 19, 2007 Past newsletters can be accessed at: http://pages.prodigy.net/rockaway/ACNewsmenu.htm The PASSUR airport flight tracking system at many major U.S. airports http://www.passur.com/sites.htm (you must have Java installed to view it). If you want to get the newsletter sent to you every week, sign up to AviationWatch. Bill Mulcahy rockaway@prodigy.net
County Hires Law Firm To Fight Airspace Redesign Scheme!!!

As
Bill Sees It (Editorial): Will
Rockland County Really Go Through With Their Airspace Redesign Scheme Lawsuit? I
am glad to see that Rockland County, New York hired a law firm to
"pursue" legal action against the FAA and their outrageous Airspace
Redesign Plan for the northeast states. According to the news stories some towns
may be joining the county in the lawsuit. If a lawsuit is ever to be
successful against the FAA it should have MANY communities joining in it. As
the FAA's strategy is to divide and conquer their victims, united action by many
communities is the one thing they dread the most. If a lawsuit is ever to be won
against the FAA bastards the
law firms (the more the merrier) should not focus their effort only on one
particular community's impacts. If I'm not mistaken the plan can be stopped
if there is proof that any part of it violates the National Environmental
Policy Act or any other federal laws. The one aspect I'm most familiar with
is how the airspace scheme leaves out the fact that JFK Airport are routed over
poor and minority areas in Rockaway, New York and that future increased flights
will increase this injustice. But in the poor and minority Rockaway community
there is no organization to fight the FAA, just politicians who have sold their
community's out. I would think a good partner in a lawsuit might be the
Staten Island communities that apparently, due to a last minute change, are
now
going to get Newark night flights. As the airspace plan will bring more
LaGuardia flights over Riker's Island prison, maybe a prisoner advocate group
might join the lawsuit. Weeklong Protest Of
Heathrow Airport's Pollution!!! While communities in the Northeastern
United States wait until a hideous plan, which will dump more aviation noise on
millions of people, is almost put in place before they even bother to hire
a lawyer, the English people are taking "direct action" to stop their
airport's expanding and increasing contribution to global warming. What has happened to the revolutionary spirit in America?
Once we were a leader in environmentalist thinking. Now we just seem to have
given up our souls to the corporations and their bought and paid for politicians
and their corrupt government agencies. The FAA Changed Their
Airspace Redesign Site Address!!! Speaking of corrupt government
agencies, I clicked on FAA Airspace Redesign web site in last week's newsletter
and lo and behold I got a blank page. Apparently the good people at the FAA
thought it would be helpful to the public if they changed it. The FAA is always
thinking of ways to better serve the people, the aviation industry people that
is. The new site is: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/nas_redesign/regional_guidance/eastern_reg/nynjphl_redesign/

England:
Heathrow Airport Expansion Protestors Arrested At "Climate Camp!!!!" Police
arrested 11 people staging a climate protest outside Biggin Hill airport in Kent
on Thursday as part of the wider against the expansion of Heathrow airport.
Several had chained themselves to the perimeter fence. A similar protest was
held outside Farnborough airport in Hampshire. Both airports reported business
as usual. The protests came in the middle of a week-long climate camp outside
Heathrow, the world's busiest international airport, whose organisers have
promised unspecified "direct action" against expansion plans. Scientists
say air transport contributes heavily to global warming, noting that the carbon
dioxide and water vapour emitted at altitude are four times more potent than at
sea level. The government is committed to tackling climate change by cutting CO2
emissions but also backs a rapid expansion of air travel, which is set to double
in the next 25 years. The arrests on Thursday bring to 16 the total number of
arrests connected with the climate camp since Sunday. Editor's Note: Right
on!!! I only wish we had people who were willing to take more "direct
action" against airport expansion. Apparently it isn't "chic"
enough for phony American environmentalists. http://www.javno.com/en/world/clanak.php?id=71673
Rockland
County, New York Wants To Fight FAA Redesign Plan!!! NEW CITY - The
county has hired a law firm to pursue legal action against the Federal Aviation
Administration in hopes of derailing a proposal that would result in hundreds of
flights over Rockland. County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef said yesterday that
Holland & Knight would look into whether the FAA violated noise-mitigation
laws while crafting its five-state airspace redesign plan. Describing it as a
David-and-Goliath fight, Vanderhoef said the lawyers would search for other
"fatal flaws" that could potentially invalidate the FAA's final
environmental impact statement. The FAA submitted the FEIS on its preferred plan
on Aug. 3, meaning the law firm has little more than two weeks to file an
objection before the 30-day comment period closes. A decision is expected next
month; the county, however, could also bring a lawsuit. "I'm an optimist
that we can really disrupt this thing," Vanderhoef said. "But as a
matter of history, at this stage when you get this far along and they haven't
listened to you, the chances of them listening or your succeeding are generally
rare. But it's not that it can't be done." The leaders of Orangetown and
Ramapo said yesterday that their towns would join the county in legal
proceedings against the FAA. Editor's Note: Better late than never. I hope
this is all another scam to fool the public and make a few more lawyers richer.
This plan has more holes in it than Swiss cheese sandwich. http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070816/NEWS03/708160383/1019/NEWS03
New
York: Rail Link To Stewart Airport Explored!!! Metro-North Railroad has
studied the feasibility of building a rail link between Stewart International
Airport and New York City three times since 1971, and only now is it prepared to
advance the idea. The timing is no accident. The railroad, in requesting
proposals from consultants for analyzing the alternatives identified in the 2003
study, makes repeated mention of the Port Authority's pending $78.5 million
purchase of the long-term lease to operate the airport from the National Express
Group. "There are a number of different things happening and we think it's
the right time to "¦ revisit the idea of providing transit access to
Stewart Airport," said Marjorie Anders, a Metro-North spokeswoman.
"There's an economic development opportunity with the Port Authority taking
over. There is synergy with the ARC tunnel (and) the potential for transit on
the Tappan Zee Bridge." Consultants are scheduled to tour the study area
Tuesday with Metro-North staff and to submit their proposals before Sept. 28. Editor's
Note: I can hear the whistles blowing now. I wonder if the freight train will
operate at night, like the Stewart Airport air cargo hub is secretly planned to
do. How much money did Rep. Hall and Hinchey take to support the Port Authority
takeover of Stewart. http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/BIZ/708190330
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Important Aviation News Stories This Week
NEW CITY - The county has hired a law firm to pursue legal action against the Federal Aviation Administration in hopes of derailing a proposal that would result in hundreds of flights over Rockland.
County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef said yesterday that Holland & Knight would look into whether the FAA violated noise-mitigation laws while crafting its five-state airspace redesign plan.
Describing it as a David-and-Goliath fight, Vanderhoef said the lawyers would search for other "fatal flaws" that could potentially invalidate the FAA's final environmental impact statement.
The FAA submitted the FEIS on its preferred plan on Aug. 3, meaning the law firm has little more than two weeks to file an objection before the 30-day comment period closes. A decision is expected next month; the county, however, could also bring a lawsuit.
"I'm an optimist that we can really disrupt this thing," Vanderhoef said. "But as a matter of history, at this stage when you get this far along and they haven't listened to you, the chances of them listening or your succeeding are generally rare. But it's not that it can't be done."
The leaders of Orangetown and Ramapo said yesterday that their towns would join the county in legal proceedings against the FAA.
"It certainly makes sense to me that all of Rockland should speak with one voice on this issue," Orangetown Supervisor Thom Kleiner said.
Ramapo Supervisor Christopher St. Lawrence said his town would "help in any way we can."
"Ramapo will partner with the county and other municipalities or counties in the area and we will fight this FAA plan," he said. "I believe that we can win on the environmental issues, the pollution issues and the noise issues."
Suffern resident Rick Sinclair was pleased to learn the county was at least giving it a shot. He said he was outraged the FAA had failed to inform Rockland residents and local officials of its plans to create a new arrival flight path into Newark Liberty Airport over parts of Ramapo and Orangetown.
"I was appalled about the lack of due process and notification," he said. "I'm glad they're trying."
By 2011, an average of 300 to 400 flights a day could travel over the county at 6,000 to 8,000 feet, raising noise levels noticeably for some 11,000 residents. The new air traffic would travel over Rockland 60 percent of the time, or more than seven months of year, and typically during the summer.
Earlier this month, the county contacted four firms specializing in aviation-related matters. The others were Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell in Denver; Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP in New York City; and Zarin & Steinmetz in White Plains.
Vanderhoef said Holland & Knight was selected because of its expertise in aviation matters, FAA regulations and the National Environmental Policy Act. He said the firm offered a "three-pronged attack" - the ability to fight the FAA during the 30-day FEIS comment period, its ability to quickly file a lawsuit and its lobbying group in Washington.
Teno West, a partner with Holland & Knight in Manhattan, said its lawyers in New York and Washington were in the process of designing a strategy.
"Time is an issue," West said. "We're jumping right into this. I've got the teams organized and ready to get running on this. ... If there's something there, I feel confident we'll find it."
The law firm has taken on the FAA before, working on noise impact issues related to airports.
In the past, the county has used the law firm to work with its sewers and solid-waste departments.
Vanderhoef said he believed the FAA violated the 1990 Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act, which he said required that the environmental reports address the impact of noise.
"They fundamentally, fatally, did not look at the noise issue enough for everybody, not just for Rockland County," Vanderhoef said. "That means they've got to go back and redo it and that means they've got to restudy and take (it) into consideration. That's what I'm looking for.
"If I'm incorrect about my theory, there are other theories that I'm sure that experts in the National Environmental Policy Act would know," Vanderhoef added.
After evaluating the facts, the law firm will provide a list of lawyers to work on the case and how much it will cost the county.
Legislator Patrick Withers, the first Rockland government official to publicly raise the issue of the flight path, said he was confident his fellow lawmakers would support Vanderhoef's legal action.
Withers said the county should also reach out to Bergen and Westchester counties to "get our legal minds together."