Let's not forget "Angle" by Shagy and "Breatheless" by The Cores.
My point is that you can't escape growing technology. No matter what or how the record industry tries to ban music, there will be ways around it. I, for one, use mIRC to get most of my mp3s, which is a relatively obscure method (probably less than a thousand people in all the mp3 channels put together at any given time). Despite that, it's still very effective; I've been using it for at least two years, and I doubt it'll be attacked any time soon.
It's parallel to the story about Pandora's box. Once she opened the box, she released misery into the world, and it's lingered in this earth since then. Once we open the Pandora's box of, well... file-sharing, it's going to remain open. The ability to trade mp3s has been exposed. No one is going to give up and say "Well, the record labels win. That's the end of mp3s for me." People will find ways to get their mp3s, because people have a driving incentive to save a few bucks here and there; what's a more efficient way than mp3s?
Since I rarely admit I'm wrong, I think I'll pass the blame along to the record companies. A vinyl costs two freaking bucks. CDs cost, what? thirteen to sixteen dollars? And usually there's only one or two good songs that are appealing about the CD. Thirteen bucks for one good song, and eleven or so crappy ones. Don't tell me that's not incentive to go and screw over the record industry. I would say most CDs are worth no more than five bucks. Two bucks for the actual CD, and three for the songs. Five bucks I would be willing to cough up; thirteen I would not. So I like to consider it "poetic justice."