newsrack blog |
|
|
Fair and balanced news and opinion commentary by Thomas Nephew. Can you hear me now? e-mail
front page archives, selected posts about this blog news links, blogrolls subscriptions ![]() coalition for darfur other blogs german blogs maryland blogs md ![]() DC Bloggers rocky top brigade specialty blogs resources charities international law iraq detainee abuse iraq sanctions islam subscriptions blog feed (Atom) ![]() comments feed (RSS) bloglines, my yahoo ![]() controls
ttlb |
Saturday, April 22, 2006
Fair and balanced, that's me Having just been mean to the Washington Post, I want to agree wholeheartedly with their take on the Falun Gong reporter who yelled at Hu Jintao. The editorial (Overreacting to Protest) asks, "does Ms. Wang deserve to go to prison for six months?" and answers: That might be the response to embarrassing and rude speech in Beijing. It shouldn't be in Washington. But yesterday the U.S. government charged Ms. Wang under a law that could bring her that sentence. [...]Remember, Bush said in his 2005 inaugural speech: All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.As long as you're not standing on the White House lawn. Department of obvious points Part of being out of the loop in Italy was missing the quickening pace of generals voicing criticism of Donald Rumsfeld: Zinni, Newbold, Eaton, to name a few. Gary Farber points out that the ensuing defense of Rumsfeld by current and former members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) like General Pace or General Myers doesn't mean much as far as Iraq operations go: So when Meyers or any of the JCS then, or now, say they have no problems with how Rumsfeld handled Iraq, well, this doesn't mean remotely as much as it would mean if they had much of anything to do with Iraq.That's a good obvious point. Here's another one: the fact that all the critical generals concerned were retired generals negates any real concerns about undermining civilian control of the armed forces because they're, well, civilians. This isn't just some cute debating point. The concern (at least as I see it) with active duty military weighing in on civilian defense and war policymaking is that they can actively undermine civilian decisions, or potential decisions, that they dislike. No such problem exists for retired generals: no one has to obey their orders. Some writers have tried to preserve their indignation by pointing to retired generals citing anonymous active duty generals who share their views. So vague, second hand, anonymous opinions by an unknown number of officers endanger our constitutional system? Get a grip. As long as it doesn't rise to the level of, say, a Colin Powell actively opposing his commander in chief's legitimate political views on gays in the military, we're fine. Once clever folks ranging from Kevin Drum to the Washington Post editorial board have fully grokked the distinction between retired and active military personnel holding forth on political issues of the day, they'll find they ought to redirect their ire. Given that Joint Chiefs chairman Peter Pace went out of his way to put his thumb on the scales of a civilian debate -- Dana Milbank described him as "moonlighting yesterday as Rumsfeld's PR guy" -- Pace has earned exactly the "civilian control" criticism that could not possibly apply to Newbold, Zinni et al. Thursday, April 20, 2006
I'm The Decider I am me and Rummy's he, Iraq is free and we are all togetherThere's more, with sound. Via eRobin. Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Italy travelogue What a trip! True, we'll be paying for it for a while, but: what a trip. As I did with our Germany trip a couple of years ago, I'll be adding back-dated posts (posts dated to the time of the trip, rather than the actual date of the post) over the next weeks, along with some of the pictures we took along the way. The outline will be
Right now there are only three photos there of the twenty or so I have available. On the other hand, at that rate I'm liable to post another 20 or 25 photos on my Flickr.com site. However, I'm not a paying Flickr member, so I'll be adding pictures slowly, as my monthly upload limit allows. Subscribing to this feed (RSS) or this one (Atom) provides an easy way to check for new ones. By the way, you can also subscribe to a "Feedblitz" e-mail notification of new "newsrack" posts here; that might make it a bit easier to know when backdated posts have been posted. It's easy to unsubscribe. I'm trying to catch up on the news as well, but I've been a bit out of the loop for a while; meanwhile, this blog might serve as an occasional welcome Italian vacation from the news. I'll say that I was expecting to still be reading about Libby's revelation about Bush authorizing leaks. But the growing Iran drumbeat and the immigration demonstrations were going to push that out of the limelight a little -- the prospect of yet more war and the concerns of millions of immigrants trump Beltway skulduggery. ===== UPDATE, 4/26: A couple of posts are up now, click on the "Rome" and "Rome, continued" links or scroll down if you're on the home page. Also, Feedblitz doesn't register backdated posts as new, so that won't work. UPDATE, 5/5: There are about 30 Italy photos on my Flickr.com site now; many are displayed below, some aren't. Have a look! Monday, April 17, 2006
Italy trip: miscellaneous travel notes This is a catch-all post with various notes about what worked and what didn't in Italy. Thumbs up
Thumbs down Certainly nothing that "ruined" our trip, and not generally thumbs way down. Just thumbs down.
Various and sundry
[Italy travelogue: home] [posted on 5/4] Copyright © 2001-2007 Thomas Nephew All rights reserved |